<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Accountability Archives - C-Suite Analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com/tag/accountability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Business-Driven Employee Retention Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Yes, HR, You Were Always Right: You Cannot Solve Turnover By Yourself</title>
		<link>https://c-suiteanalytics.com/yes-hr-you-were-always-right/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Finnegan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Turnover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Interviews]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-suiteanalytics.com/?p=1939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>800 hands immediately shot up in the air. This was the scene at the SHRM Annual Conference in Chicago last month, when I addressed a large crowd on “Cutting Turnover by 40% and More”. When I said “Raise your hand if in any way your executives have said, ‘Turnover is high. HR, go fix it’”,&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com/yes-hr-you-were-always-right/">Yes, HR, You Were Always Right: You Cannot Solve Turnover By Yourself</a> appeared first on <a href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com">C-Suite Analytics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>800 hands immediately shot up in the air.</p>
<p>This was the scene at the SHRM Annual Conference in Chicago last month, when I addressed a large crowd on “Cutting Turnover by 40% and More”. When I said “Raise your hand if in any way your executives have said, ‘Turnover is high. HR, go fix it’”, no arms went up half way, no one hesitated. This was clearly a sore spot.</p>
<p>During that session I described four clients companies that had cut turnover by 40% and more, and how each of their forward-thinking HR teams had bought into crossing the boundary from HR to executives to implement Finnegan’s Arrow…to re-position employee retention from HR back to the operations sides of their companies.</p>
<p><a href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com/"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-1941 size-full" title="Finnegans Arrow For TM" src="https://c-suiteanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/FinnegansArrow_ForTM.png" alt="Finnegans Arrow For TM" width="850" height="393" srcset="https://c-suiteanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/FinnegansArrow_ForTM.png 850w, https://c-suiteanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/FinnegansArrow_ForTM-300x139.png 300w, https://c-suiteanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/FinnegansArrow_ForTM-768x355.png 768w, https://c-suiteanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/FinnegansArrow_ForTM-600x277.png 600w" sizes="(max-width: 850px) 100vw, 850px" /></a></p>
<p>Steps one and two are to invite finance to help place a cost on turnover, and then inspire the top team to address it in a way only they can, with retention goals for leaders across all levels. One must ask if turnover is so important, why haven’t they set goals for it?</p>
<p>Stay Interviews follow which are the absolute, most powerful retention solution for leaders on all levels, but will fall to flavor-of-the month status without the preceding costs and goals.</p>
<p>Forecasts then follow whereby leaders actually do just that, forecast how long each employee will stay, so those on top can provide help to keep top performers. Finnegan’s Arrow closes with Accountability, as leaders are now accountable for achieving their goals and developing accurate forecasts…just as salespeople have been doing for decades.</p>
<p>So thus far I’ve said (1) HR is unfairly held accountable for retention, (2) executives must lead with dollars, goals, stay interviews, forecasts, and accountability, and (3) here’s a plan to do just that. Yet most HR professionals remain stuck in wrong-accountability-land, and struggle emotionally each day on the job.</p>
<p>One reason they remain stuck is implementing Finnegan’s Arrow requires courage. HR must approach finance to help with the cost study, executives to establish retention goals, and then gain support for all additional tools. This is a major leap for many in HR who prefer instead to “solve” turnover with better onboarding and the plethora of one-size-fits-all employee programs that have proven over decades to be ineffective. In other words, we will implement HR-driven solutions that only require us to work with HR.</p>
<p>Our executives have never needed us more as employee retention and engagement top their lists of greatest obstacles to success. Our job, then, is to teach them that they hold the authority to fix these things. And then give them a plan to do so.</p>
<p>I’m offering you a resource as I’ll be glad to help. Please email me if you’d like to chat to learn more….<a href="mailto:dfinnegan@c-suiteanalytics.com">dfinnegan@c-suiteanalytics.com</a>…and take care.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com/yes-hr-you-were-always-right/">Yes, HR, You Were Always Right: You Cannot Solve Turnover By Yourself</a> appeared first on <a href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com">C-Suite Analytics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our New Year&#8217;s Gift:  The Employee Retention Secret Sauce</title>
		<link>https://c-suiteanalytics.com/our-new-years-gift-the-employee-retention-secret-sauce/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Finnegan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 22:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turnover]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-suiteanalytics.com/?p=1527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What is the largest improvement in cutting turnover in 12 months that is realistic?&#160; Is it 88%, 46%, or 41%?&#160; Any of those are the correct answer for three of our recent clients. First, some perspective. Cutting turnover by more than 40% saves small companies hundreds of thousands of $s and large companies millions. Most&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com/our-new-years-gift-the-employee-retention-secret-sauce/">Our New Year&#8217;s Gift:  The Employee Retention Secret Sauce</a> appeared first on <a href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com">C-Suite Analytics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the largest improvement in cutting turnover in 12 months that is realistic?&nbsp; Is it 88%, 46%, or 41%?&nbsp; Any of those are the correct answer for three of our recent clients.</p>
<p>First, some perspective. Cutting turnover by more than 40% saves small companies hundreds of thousands of $s and large companies millions. Most companies don’t set turnover improvement goals but those that do set them at 20% improvement, tops. Forty percent improvement is unheard of.</p>
<p><em>Here’s what our clients did not do:</em> Raise pay, start new benefits, have more company meetings, implement a career coaching system, use data to forecast turnover, conducts engagement surveys, conduct exit surveys, or implement any new employee program.</p>
<p><em>Here’s what those clients did:</em> Developed the dollar cost of turnover, implemented retention goals, hired applicants who would stay, and trained all managers to conduct stay interviews.</p>
<p>What are the key differences between the two approaches?</p>
<ul>
<li>Targeted vs broad, as treating all employees the same is the ticket to retention failure</li>
<li>Tops-down driven since getting executives to take action requires them to see turnover as dollars versus percentages</li>
<li>Implementing hiring tools we’ve developed that screen out retention risks</li>
</ul>
<p>And most importantly, leader accountability steers all retention efforts as the number one reason employees stay or leave is how much they trust their boss.</p>
<p>We learned long ago that common sense does not imply common practice. Said another way, we sometimes follow others rather than think about better solutions. We look forward to connecting in this new, ambitious year to continue sending productive thoughts.</p>
<p>May this year be the very best in your life, ever. Peace.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com/our-new-years-gift-the-employee-retention-secret-sauce/">Our New Year&#8217;s Gift:  The Employee Retention Secret Sauce</a> appeared first on <a href="https://c-suiteanalytics.com">C-Suite Analytics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
